A US court judge has dismissed several claims in the government's antitrust case against Google

The antitrust case against Google by the government has been substantially reduced. A US district court judge dismissed several claims made by the Department of Justice and a group of states, which included the allegation that Google Search harms competing services.

The case originated from two lawsuits filed in 2020 by the DOJ and 38 state attorneys general against Google. While they were initially filed separately, they were mostly consolidated later on. The accusations focused on various instances of anti-competitive behavior by Google, such as allegedly designing its search engine to disadvantage competitors like Yelp, Expedia, and Tripadvisor.

However, Judge Amit Mehta dismissed this particular claim, stating that the government's evidence of anti-competitive harm relied heavily on the opinion and speculation of its expert, law professor Jonathan Baker, rather than concrete evidence. Additionally, Mehta dropped the DOJ's accusations related to Google's agreements with developers and Android phone makers since the government had abandoned those allegations.

Despite these dismissals, certain key arguments against Google still stand. For instance, the government's claims that Google violated antitrust policies by making Google the default search engine on mobile browsers were not dismissed by Judge Mehta. The trial is set to begin on September 12th, and it remains to be seen how the remaining arguments will unfold in court.

In response to the judge's decision, Kent Walker, Google's president of global affairs and chief legal officer, expressed appreciation for the court's careful consideration and the dismissal of claims regarding the design of Google Search. He also emphasized Google's intention to demonstrate during the trial that their promotion and distribution of services are both legal and pro-competitive.

Signal Introduces Usernames for Encrypted Messaging: A Secure Way to Connect

Signal, the encrypted messaging service, is launching a new feature in the coming weeks: support for usernames. This beta feature allows users to establish unique usernames, enabling connections without divulging phone numbers. source: Signal Blog To create a username, navigate to your settings and select "Profile." Once you've chosen a unique username, generate a QR code or link to share with others. Recipients can connect by entering your username into the chat bar. Usernames can be changed at any time, though previous usernames may be claimed by others. Signal began testing usernames last fall. Unlike social media platforms, Signal usernames do not serve as logins or public handles. They offer a discreet means of communication without revealing personal phone numbers. While a phone number is required to register for Signal, sharing it is optional. Usernames remain private and do not appear on profiles or in chats unless shared explicitly. As Randall Sarafa, Signal'

AT&T Resets Millions of Customer Passcodes After Data Leak: What You Need to Know

AT&T recently confirmed a significant data breach affecting over 7.6 million current customers and 65 million former customers. The leaked information, which dates back to 2019 or earlier, includes personal details like names, addresses, phone numbers, and social security numbers. Fortunately, financial information and call history were not compromised. In response to the breach, AT&T has reset passcodes for affected customers. Passcodes, usually four-digit numbers, serve as an additional layer of security when accessing accounts. However, security experts warn that the encrypted passcodes leaked alongside customer information could be easily deciphered, posing a risk of unauthorized account access. Affected customers are advised to set up free fraud alerts with major credit bureaus and remain vigilant for any suspicious activity related to their accounts. AT&T is proactively reaching out to impacted customers via email or letter to inform them about the breach and the meas

Safeguarding Internet Privacy: Supreme Court of Canada Upholds Protection of IP Addresses

In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court of Canada affirmed the significance of privacy rights concerning internet addresses. The court declared that police cannot simply obtain a suspect’s IP address without a court order, emphasizing the expectation of privacy that Canadian residents hold for such information. The court's decision stemmed from a case in 2017 involving Calgary police investigating fraudulent online activities at a liquor store. Initially, police demanded IP addresses from a credit card processor, which eventually led to obtaining subscriber information from Telus. This information was pivotal in making arrests and securing convictions in multiple offenses. Despite previous convictions, the accused contested the legality of obtaining IP addresses without proper authorization. The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, asserted that IP addresses carry a reasonable expectation of privacy, necessitating judicial approval before access. The ruling emphasizes that obtaining jud

THEHACKCITY

Search This Blog