Skip to main content

AI-generated art cannot be copyrighted, ruled by US Federal Judge

Steven Thaler and/or Creativity Machine
Steven Thaler and/or Creativity Machine

 

Judge Beryl A. Howell of the United States District Court has ruled that artworks generated by artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be granted copyright protection. This decision came as a response to a lawsuit brought against the US Copyright Office by Stephen Thaler, who sought copyright for an AI-generated image produced using his Creativity Machine algorithm.


Thaler attempted to secure copyright for the AI-generated artwork on behalf of the Creativity Machine, with the intention of being recognized as the owner and the machine as the creator. However, his requests were consistently denied by the Copyright Office.


Following the Copyright Office's final rejection, Thaler took legal action against the Office, arguing that its denial was unjust and not in line with legal standards. Nonetheless, Judge Howell disagreed with this perspective. In her verdict, she highlighted that copyright protection has historically been extended only to creations that bear the influence of human input and authorship. She emphasized that the concept of "human authorship" is an essential prerequisite for copyright eligibility.


Judge Howell cited previous cases to underscore this principle, including the famous example of a monkey selfie. In contrast, she referenced a case in which a woman compiled a book based on her interpretation of "dictated" words from a supernatural source. This case was deemed suitable for copyright protection due to the perceived human involvement.


However, Judge Howell acknowledged the evolving landscape of copyright as it intersects with AI technology. She recognized the emergence of new challenges posed by the use of AI as a creative tool, questioning the extent of human contribution necessary for AI-generated art to qualify for copyright. She observed that AI models often learn from existing works, further complicating the determination of copyright ownership and authorship.


Stephen Thaler expressed his intention to appeal the court's decision. His legal representative, Ryan Abbot of Brown Neri Smith & Khan LLP, voiced disagreement with the court's interpretation of the Copyright Act. Concurrently, the US Copyright Office released a statement supporting the court's ruling.


The intersection of US copyright law and artificial intelligence remains an area of uncertainty, with various legal disputes emerging. Notably, Sarah Silverman and other authors initiated legal action against OpenAI and Meta over data scraping practices, and programmer-lawyer Matthew Butterick filed a lawsuit alleging software piracy due to data scraping by Microsoft, GitHub, and OpenAI. The outcomes of these cases will play a role in shaping the legal landscape for AI-generated content.

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

AT&T Resets Millions of Customer Passcodes After Data Leak: What You Need to Know

AT&T recently confirmed a significant data breach affecting over 7.6 million current customers and 65 million former customers. The leaked information, which dates back to 2019 or earlier, includes personal details like names, addresses, phone numbers, and social security numbers. Fortunately, financial information and call history were not compromised. In response to the breach, AT&T has reset passcodes for affected customers. Passcodes, usually four-digit numbers, serve as an additional layer of security when accessing accounts. However, security experts warn that the encrypted passcodes leaked alongside customer information could be easily deciphered, posing a risk of unauthorized account access. Affected customers are advised to set up free fraud alerts with major credit bureaus and remain vigilant for any suspicious activity related to their accounts. AT&T is proactively reaching out to impacted customers via email or letter to inform them about the breach and the meas...
Read more

Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years in jail for FTX fraud

FTX co-founder Sam Bankman-Fried has been sentenced to 25 years in prison for his involvement in seven counts of conspiracy and fraud related to the collapse of the cryptocurrency exchange he established. The judge handed down a sentence of 240 months for four charges and 60 months for two others, along with ordering Bankman-Fried to forfeit more than $11 billion, including property, as recommended by prosecutors. The judge's decision fell short of the 40 to 50 years requested by prosecutors, but exceeded the defense's plea for six and a half years, though it was notably less than the maximum sentence of 110 years. During the trial, it was revealed that Bankman-Fried was aware of the risks FTX faced, misused customer funds, and knowingly engaged in wrongful activities. He justified his actions by weighing the risk of getting caught against potential gains. The judge dismissed claims that customers would be reimbursed, highlighting that FTX customers suffered losses of $8 billio...
Read more

What is a VPN and why would you need one?

  Understanding VPN: A Comprehensive Guide for Beginners In today's digital age, the internet is an essential part of our daily lives. From online banking and shopping to social networking and entertainment, we rely on the internet for numerous activities. However, with the increasing reliance on the internet, concerns about online privacy and security have become more prominent. This is where a VPN comes into play. If you're unfamiliar with the term, this guide will explain what a VPN is, how it works, and why you might want to consider using one. What is a VPN? VPN stands for Virtual Private Network. It is a service that creates a secure, encrypted connection between your device (such as a computer, smartphone, or tablet) and the internet. Think of it as a private tunnel through which your data travels, hidden from prying eyes. How Does a VPN Work? When you connect to the internet without a VPN, your data travels through your Internet Service Provider (ISP) and can be potenti...
Read more