Skip to main content

Checkout.com terminates Binance payment processing service




London's credit card processing firm, Checkout.com, which expanded its operations by facilitating numerous crypto transactions for Binance clientele, has unexpectedly terminated its contract with the crypto behemoth, according to information obtained by Forbes.


CEO Guillaume Pousaz of Checkout.com conveyed the decision through a sequence of letters dated August 9 and 11, directed at Binance. The termination was attributed to factors such as "reports of regulators actions and orders in relevant jurisdictions" and "inquiries from partners," as stated in the initial letter. A subsequent letter, sent just two days after the first and disclosed to Forbes, cited additional concerns encompassing Binance's anti-money laundering protocols, compliance controls, and sanctions adherence. This led to the final termination date set for August 17. A spokesperson for Checkout, Lewis Jones, confirmed the termination of their partnership with Binance to Forbes.


In response, Binance expressed disagreement with Checkout's reasoning behind ending the contract and even hinted at potential legal action. Dewi Mustajab, a spokesperson for Binance, communicated that despite the severance with Checkout, the company remains committed to bolstering its compliance efforts and cultivating better relations with regulators and partners. She emphasized that Checkout's departure would not impact Binance's service continuity.


The abrupt termination of ties between Checkout.com and Binance came after Binance's recent announcement to discontinue Binance Connect, its cryptocurrency trading platform for businesses to accept digital payments. This service was supported by Checkout, according to an individual familiar with the arrangement. However, Mustajab indicated that the service had a limited user base and transaction volume.


Checkout.com, which has been handling approximately $300 million to $400 million in Binance transactions over the past months, has joined a growing list of payment service providers distancing themselves from Binance due to the ongoing investigations across multiple countries. However, Checkout disputed the mentioned transaction figures as being inaccurate and overstated. Binance has faced legal action from two U.S. agencies for alleged fraud and money laundering, leading to its exit from various jurisdictions. Notably, European payments provider PaySafe ended its collaboration with Binance in June.


The decision by Checkout.com to sever ties with Binance carries substantial implications for the crypto exchange, especially considering Binance's instrumental role in propelling Checkout to prominence in Europe. Binance was once Checkout's largest client, contributing to processing nearly $2 billion worth of Binance transactions in a single month of 2021, according to an individual with direct knowledge. This surge in business significantly boosted Checkout's revenue and culminated in a massive $1 billion funding round in the past year, valuing the company at $40 billion and elevating founder and CEO Guillaume Pousaz to one of Europe's wealthiest individuals. You can read more here

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Signal Introduces Usernames for Encrypted Messaging: A Secure Way to Connect

Signal, the encrypted messaging service, is launching a new feature in the coming weeks: support for usernames. This beta feature allows users to establish unique usernames, enabling connections without divulging phone numbers. source: Signal Blog To create a username, navigate to your settings and select "Profile." Once you've chosen a unique username, generate a QR code or link to share with others. Recipients can connect by entering your username into the chat bar. Usernames can be changed at any time, though previous usernames may be claimed by others. Signal began testing usernames last fall. Unlike social media platforms, Signal usernames do not serve as logins or public handles. They offer a discreet means of communication without revealing personal phone numbers. While a phone number is required to register for Signal, sharing it is optional. Usernames remain private and do not appear on profiles or in chats unless shared explicitly. As Randall Sarafa, Signal'
Read more

AT&T Resets Millions of Customer Passcodes After Data Leak: What You Need to Know

AT&T recently confirmed a significant data breach affecting over 7.6 million current customers and 65 million former customers. The leaked information, which dates back to 2019 or earlier, includes personal details like names, addresses, phone numbers, and social security numbers. Fortunately, financial information and call history were not compromised. In response to the breach, AT&T has reset passcodes for affected customers. Passcodes, usually four-digit numbers, serve as an additional layer of security when accessing accounts. However, security experts warn that the encrypted passcodes leaked alongside customer information could be easily deciphered, posing a risk of unauthorized account access. Affected customers are advised to set up free fraud alerts with major credit bureaus and remain vigilant for any suspicious activity related to their accounts. AT&T is proactively reaching out to impacted customers via email or letter to inform them about the breach and the meas
Read more

Safeguarding Internet Privacy: Supreme Court of Canada Upholds Protection of IP Addresses

In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court of Canada affirmed the significance of privacy rights concerning internet addresses. The court declared that police cannot simply obtain a suspect’s IP address without a court order, emphasizing the expectation of privacy that Canadian residents hold for such information. The court's decision stemmed from a case in 2017 involving Calgary police investigating fraudulent online activities at a liquor store. Initially, police demanded IP addresses from a credit card processor, which eventually led to obtaining subscriber information from Telus. This information was pivotal in making arrests and securing convictions in multiple offenses. Despite previous convictions, the accused contested the legality of obtaining IP addresses without proper authorization. The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, asserted that IP addresses carry a reasonable expectation of privacy, necessitating judicial approval before access. The ruling emphasizes that obtaining jud
Read more