iPhone 14, 14 Pro owners are complaining about declining battery capacity

A number of iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Pro users are raising concerns reminiscent of the "batterygate" era. They're reporting that their phones, with less than a year of usage, are displaying higher levels of battery degradation than anticipated. In July, Sam Kohl from AppleTrack tweeted about his iPhone 14 Pro, which had already dropped to a maximum capacity of 90 percent. This rapid decline was more pronounced compared to his experience with previous iPhones. Many other users echoed similar issues in the thread.

Officially, Apple states that iPhone batteries should maintain "up to 80 percent of its original capacity at 500 complete charge cycles." As rumors swirl around the impending launch of the iPhone 15 series, it's speculated that these new devices will incorporate larger batteries, potentially up to 10-18 percent larger than the current models.

Furthermore, this situation becomes more challenging when considering the cost of replacing the battery on an iPhone 14 or iPhone 14 Pro once the one-year warranty has expired (unless covered by AppleCare or an extended service plan). Last year, the battery replacement cost increased by $30, from $69 for earlier models to $99. However, there's an option for DIY battery replacement if one prefers to avoid visiting an Apple Store or a third-party repair shop.

The battery health monitoring feature for iPhones was introduced in the same iOS 11.3 update that allowed users to toggle the performance throttling feature associated with "batterygate." Apple implemented this throttling as a measure to protect iPhones with aging batteries, which eventually led to significant legal settlements.

Signal Introduces Usernames for Encrypted Messaging: A Secure Way to Connect

Signal, the encrypted messaging service, is launching a new feature in the coming weeks: support for usernames. This beta feature allows users to establish unique usernames, enabling connections without divulging phone numbers. source: Signal Blog To create a username, navigate to your settings and select "Profile." Once you've chosen a unique username, generate a QR code or link to share with others. Recipients can connect by entering your username into the chat bar. Usernames can be changed at any time, though previous usernames may be claimed by others. Signal began testing usernames last fall. Unlike social media platforms, Signal usernames do not serve as logins or public handles. They offer a discreet means of communication without revealing personal phone numbers. While a phone number is required to register for Signal, sharing it is optional. Usernames remain private and do not appear on profiles or in chats unless shared explicitly. As Randall Sarafa, Signal'

AT&T Resets Millions of Customer Passcodes After Data Leak: What You Need to Know

AT&T recently confirmed a significant data breach affecting over 7.6 million current customers and 65 million former customers. The leaked information, which dates back to 2019 or earlier, includes personal details like names, addresses, phone numbers, and social security numbers. Fortunately, financial information and call history were not compromised. In response to the breach, AT&T has reset passcodes for affected customers. Passcodes, usually four-digit numbers, serve as an additional layer of security when accessing accounts. However, security experts warn that the encrypted passcodes leaked alongside customer information could be easily deciphered, posing a risk of unauthorized account access. Affected customers are advised to set up free fraud alerts with major credit bureaus and remain vigilant for any suspicious activity related to their accounts. AT&T is proactively reaching out to impacted customers via email or letter to inform them about the breach and the meas

Safeguarding Internet Privacy: Supreme Court of Canada Upholds Protection of IP Addresses

In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court of Canada affirmed the significance of privacy rights concerning internet addresses. The court declared that police cannot simply obtain a suspect’s IP address without a court order, emphasizing the expectation of privacy that Canadian residents hold for such information. The court's decision stemmed from a case in 2017 involving Calgary police investigating fraudulent online activities at a liquor store. Initially, police demanded IP addresses from a credit card processor, which eventually led to obtaining subscriber information from Telus. This information was pivotal in making arrests and securing convictions in multiple offenses. Despite previous convictions, the accused contested the legality of obtaining IP addresses without proper authorization. The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, asserted that IP addresses carry a reasonable expectation of privacy, necessitating judicial approval before access. The ruling emphasizes that obtaining jud

THEHACKCITY

Search This Blog