Skip to main content

Google kills Pixel Pass and people aren't happy about it




 

In October 2021, Google introduced the Pixel Pass subscription program alongside the launch of the Pixel 6 series phones. This program offered three key benefits for a single monthly payment of $45 for the Pixel 6 or $55 for the 6 Pro: access to Google's premier mobile services, device protection, and regular device upgrades.


However, on a recent Tuesday, Google sent emails to Pixel Pass customers announcing that they would no longer be accepting new Pixel Pass subscriptions or renewals.


Customers who had already subscribed weren't losing any special privileges since the subscription fee covered the cost of the phone and a discounted rate for bundled services over a two-year period. Nevertheless, some disappointed customers in the Google Pixel subreddit expressed concerns about losing certain perks, such as a lower rate they had previously locked in from Google Play Music to join the Play Pass and losing access to bundled services that were part of the package.


The Pixel Pass subscription package was initially marketed as a convenient way to ensure a hassle-free upgrade process two years down the line. However, this option has now become uncertain for loyal Pixel customers, especially as Google prepares to launch the new Pixel 8 lineup on October 4th.


The promised "regular device upgrades" will not materialize for any Pixel Pass subscribers, even for those who raced to order a Pixel 6 as soon as it became available (like the author of this article). This is because there is still more than a month to go before the earliest subscribers hit the two-year mark and become eligible for an upgrade. While it's not entirely surprising that Google has added Pixel Pass to its list of discontinued products and services, the timing of this news is noteworthy.


The Pixel Pass offering remained available through the launch of last year's Pixel 7 series. However, by May of this year, its Twitter account informed a potential Pixel Fold owner that the package would not be available for that device. This aligns with the explanation provided to current subscribers this week.


Google's official FAQ, as of August 29th, 2023, explains the discontinuation of Pixel Pass as follows:


Why is Pixel Pass being discontinued?

We offer the best value for our hardware products and provide users with the flexibility to purchase their preferred services. We continuously evaluate our offerings based on customer feedback and offer different ways for users to access the best of Google.


In the FAQ, Google asserts that users can still upgrade their Pixel device after 24 months with 0 percent APR financing available through either Google Fi or the Google Store, utilizing the same partner as Pixel Pass, Synchrony Bank. However, this can't be done while maintaining the Pixel Pass package once it expires.


Regarding refunds, the FAQ clarifies that Google won't issue them:


Refunds aren't issued because we're committed to fulfilling our promise for the full 2-year term on the Pixel Pass subscription. However, a $100 loyalty reward credit is issued to all active subscribers.


Subscribers who signed up through the Google Store receive $100 Google Store credit, which can be used for any Google Store purchase. Subscribers who subscribed through Google Fi Wireless receive a $100 coupon code, redeemable toward a Pixel device purchase on Google Fi Wireless.


While a $100 credit is not insignificant, it may still disappoint subscribers, especially since it requires engaging with the company for another subscription term after the initial agreement was altered 22 months into the two-year term.

Popular posts from this blog

Signal Introduces Usernames for Encrypted Messaging: A Secure Way to Connect

Signal, the encrypted messaging service, is launching a new feature in the coming weeks: support for usernames. This beta feature allows users to establish unique usernames, enabling connections without divulging phone numbers. source: Signal Blog To create a username, navigate to your settings and select "Profile." Once you've chosen a unique username, generate a QR code or link to share with others. Recipients can connect by entering your username into the chat bar. Usernames can be changed at any time, though previous usernames may be claimed by others. Signal began testing usernames last fall. Unlike social media platforms, Signal usernames do not serve as logins or public handles. They offer a discreet means of communication without revealing personal phone numbers. While a phone number is required to register for Signal, sharing it is optional. Usernames remain private and do not appear on profiles or in chats unless shared explicitly. As Randall Sarafa, Signal'

AT&T Resets Millions of Customer Passcodes After Data Leak: What You Need to Know

AT&T recently confirmed a significant data breach affecting over 7.6 million current customers and 65 million former customers. The leaked information, which dates back to 2019 or earlier, includes personal details like names, addresses, phone numbers, and social security numbers. Fortunately, financial information and call history were not compromised. In response to the breach, AT&T has reset passcodes for affected customers. Passcodes, usually four-digit numbers, serve as an additional layer of security when accessing accounts. However, security experts warn that the encrypted passcodes leaked alongside customer information could be easily deciphered, posing a risk of unauthorized account access. Affected customers are advised to set up free fraud alerts with major credit bureaus and remain vigilant for any suspicious activity related to their accounts. AT&T is proactively reaching out to impacted customers via email or letter to inform them about the breach and the meas

Safeguarding Internet Privacy: Supreme Court of Canada Upholds Protection of IP Addresses

In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court of Canada affirmed the significance of privacy rights concerning internet addresses. The court declared that police cannot simply obtain a suspect’s IP address without a court order, emphasizing the expectation of privacy that Canadian residents hold for such information. The court's decision stemmed from a case in 2017 involving Calgary police investigating fraudulent online activities at a liquor store. Initially, police demanded IP addresses from a credit card processor, which eventually led to obtaining subscriber information from Telus. This information was pivotal in making arrests and securing convictions in multiple offenses. Despite previous convictions, the accused contested the legality of obtaining IP addresses without proper authorization. The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, asserted that IP addresses carry a reasonable expectation of privacy, necessitating judicial approval before access. The ruling emphasizes that obtaining jud